Welcome to the Matrix

This isn't the Matrix of the movies, this is the Intersectional Grievance Matrix (IGM), and it is all too real.

There is no question that certain areas and regions of the United States (and the world) are quickly becoming "no-go" areas - for rational people.

These Orwellian areas can be subdivisions within larger areas, localized like Manhattan or state sized, like Vermont, Hawaii, and California, or they can be nation sized, like the United Kingdom. These are areas where reality doesn't exist and you are at the whim of government officials and social justice warriors, who will not determine if you committed a crime, but what that crime is and how you should be punished.

For in such places, everyone is guilty of something, they just need to invent the crime.

As in radical Islamic states, there are roving versions of religious police, modern versions of Lavrentiy Pavlovich Beria, constantly examining everyone for violations of the hierarchies of the “intersectional grievance matrix” (IGM for short). While official courts and prosecutors exist, any “woke” entity can be the judge and jury, as is often the case, people in these no-go areas are tried in public by the media.

On X, Nick Freitas (GOP member of the Virginia House of Delegates) describes how this system works:

“Woke” is not “hypersensitivity to bigotry.” It’s an inherently Marxist worldview that assigns guilt, not based on the facts of a particular case, but on the intersectional grievance matrix of the parties involved.

While a sane human being is capable of concluding that any rape or molestation is horrific, the woke must first analyze the “power structures” of the parties involved to determine who they will side with.

In this case, the vast majority of Democrats in Congress determined that since “undocumented members of the community” (i.e. illegal immigrants) were involved, then victims of rape and child molestation did not have a sufficient “intersectional score” to justify a yes vote.

Essentially a rape or molestation conviction is not sufficient for Democrats to know who the truly guilty party is.

It’s only AFTER democrats know the sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation, “gender identity,” immigration and socioeconomic statues of both the victim and the perpetrator, that they can properly analyze whether or not the act of rape or molestation are worthy of deportation."

In this process, any misdemeanor can become a capital crime and any capital crime a misdemeanor, depending on how the person fits into the matrix. One might even go free if the crime is judged to be justified by the IGM – for example, BLM protestors looting and rioting during a pandemic is nothing compared to a high school student stoically resisting a harangue of a Native American protestor or even a kid, with Native American heritage, wearing a headdress to a Kansas City Chief’s football game.

How does one avoid being “Beria-ed”?

Don’t go there. Don’t go to Manhattan, Vermont, Hawaii, or California – or sadly, the UK. Avoid doing business there - and if you are there, get out – because it is like being on the wrong side of the Berlin Wall in 1965. The minute you enter, you have entered enemy territory and are subject to their draconian authoritarianism. You are at risk – just ask Donald Trump, Daniel Penny or anyone who has been subjected to the “justice” of the IGM.

Anyone who chooses to stay within the borders of these no-go zones is equally subject to the shifting winds of the intersectional grievance matrix because different days bring different crimes. Even the “woke” can be judged insufficiently so and will find themselves in a Kafkaesque situation where they are pronounced guilty but will never know what the crime was. Since the seriousness of the charge is all that matters, the guilty will be punished by the process immediately and in advance of their failings filtering through the IGM.

Crazy?

Hell yes. You bet it is.

It is the matrix, just not Keanu’s movie version. This one is all too real.