The Real Great Replacement Theory
It's not just about votes, I'm not sure it ever was. What is to be replaced is something else altogether.
Most people believe the Great Replacement Theory is about votes – but it doesn’t really have to be.
As a matter of fact, I don’t believe it ever is just about votes.
I believe it is about creating a majority which is used as a base of social power and influence, enough to create fear in enough people so that those who are eligible to vote will do so to surrender themselves to the will of the majority, whether they be citizens or not.
That fear is a selfish fear, one by which cowards demand to be seen as brave, those without virtue to be worshiped for false virtue, and the vain to be seen as modest and humble.
Just look at today, being “humane” is the prima facie reason given by proponents of the OBC (Open Borders Crowd). “They are just oppressed people looking for asylum”, they say. “We must let them in and take care of them.” To believe this is to dismiss the countless surveys and interviews of the illegal immigrants indicating they come for economic reasons and to take advantage of the welfare openly offered them by the forces wishing them to flood our nation and use their presence to influence others.
No, this need not be about illegal immigrants being given amnesty and the vote, it is about enough of the populace weakened in conception of right and wrong, harboring the inability to resist the irresistible pull to be socially validated as a part of a sort of popular “morality”, one that has the ability to slake the hunger of human vanity – and increase the desire for it as well.
It is the ultimate self-sustaining reaction, feeding on itself while creating more fuel, a sort of addiction which only more virtue signaling satisfies.
The real Great Replacement Theory is really about swapping morality for something more flexible - the satisfaction of human vanity.
History proves there are always more than enough people who can be swayed by fear of missing out, or a simple play on their vanity and emotion. Reason and logic are always the first casualty when the popular and unscrupulous use manipulation of human vanity and emotion to achieve their goals. Do not be fooled, the goals of such people are never that they want peace and prosperity for people, what they want is power – because people will always give power to those who promise peace and prosperity, even if that promise is a disingenuously given lie.
And the Law of Salutary Contradiction is always at play, the formulation if which is: “That’s not happening and it’s good that it is”.
In an article published in the UK Guardian in 2011, the Piven half of the duo, Frances Fox Piven, wrote about the 1966 proposal by she and her husband, Richard Cloward created:
“In the article, we proposed a mobilisation of poor people and their advocates to claim the welfare benefits to which poor families were legally entitled, but that they often did not receive. We thought that the ensuing problems of rising rolls and costs would create pressures for federal reform of the archaic welfare system.”
Fox was mostly angry at Glenn Beck for sounding an early alarm. Later in the article she states:
“When the process of governing is incomprehensible, manipulation and propaganda thrives. The strange stories that Glenn Beck creates with his chalkboard gain traction with Americans, who are made anxious by the large changes that have overtaken the United States, including the election of a black president and the increasing racial diversity of the population, deindustrialisation and the decline of American power abroad, as well as cultural changes in sexual and family norms.”
In short, she enumerates and celebrates the results of her strategy while denying its deployment is a causal factor.
That’s not happening and it’s good that it is.
No one, almost, was concerned about Obama being half black. We were legitimately concerned with his hatred of America.
And you’re a bigot for noticing.