Discussion about this post

User's avatar
sean anderson's avatar

Attempts to “Cincinnatize” our Republic, especially by imposing term limits on members of the House and Senste face one formidable reality that did not exist at the time of our Founding: the existence of both a standing army and an massive administrative state. You have all heard of the “Iron Triangle,” the triad of Defense Department, defense contractors and their lobbies and the Congressional oversight committees that provide a popular electoral check on the preceding two unelected sides of the triangle. The only way the Congressional side is able to see through the suave talking and institutional memory of the other two is through experience in serving in the oversight function. Artificially limiting that ability to gain and pass down that experience by term limits: just as doin as the learning curve is starting to drop you are out of office. However I have never understood the supposed Republican logic in artificially limiting the voters’ choices. If your Representative/Senator is doing what their constituents consider to be a good job shouldn’t they have the option of retaining them in their office? Term limits already exist: if you are dissatisfied with your Representative or Senator you can turn them out during your primaries. But absolute term limits will only empower the Deep State further. Do you really want that?

No posts

Ready for more?