Shifting Gears
The radical LGBTQ movement isn't interested in inclusion, it seeks to completely reorder society.
I’ve been seeing comments on social media from proponents who treat transgenderism and “gender affirming healthcare” as something I have no right on which to opine. It usually takes the form of something I saw on Twitter from John Pavlovitz, a LGBTQ ally and liberal Christian pastor:
“I’ve been on the planet for 19,709 days and I still haven’t had a single Republican satisfactorily tell me how anyone else’s gender identity, sexual orientation, body, or marriage are any of their damn business.”
The implication that this is just about some sort of Rodney King “why can’t we just get along” state of being. Why can’t you normie, cis-gendered, Christians just stop with the transgender genocide and erasure of the LGBTQ2A++ communities?
First, this is the use of an extreme minority of an extreme minority to create an issue.
It isn’t even an argument unless the idea that the homosexual community is the same as people suffering from gender dysphoria. Following a common pattern, some deviance is introduced into society and if it isn’t met with the desired degree of opposition, radicals in the movement continue to searching for a point where it can be controversial. For example, drag shows were never a thing until “Drag Queen Story Hour” arrived. When that didn’t gain enough notice, sexually explicit drag shows twerked their way into elementary school auditoriums.
But bolting transgenderism onto the gay and lesbian movement does not make the movements the same in any way.
The way I see it, being gay or lesbian is a matter of emotional attraction – it is about to whom you are attracted, whom you choose to love. I think the same is true for the B, Q, and all the other letters, numbers and symbols used to describe those extreme minorities of deviant sexual behaviors.
The difference is that where being lesbian or gay is a matter of emotional attraction and men and women are not required to be anything other than men and women, transgenderism is not simply emotional, it is a physical disagreement with biological reality, a desire to physically transform into the opposite sex, which is an impossibility. No amount of chemicals or surgeries can do anything other than creating a skin costume for a macabre masquerade ball.
Many of those involved in the LGBTQ movement do not believe the “T” belongs. The group Gays Against Groomers exemplifies that position.
With the addition of the “T”, the LGBQ movement was taken over by radical hucksters who want to sell a form of sexual liberation and gender fluidity that is incompatible with civilization. This radical segment has adopted the old 60’s sexual revolution idea “If it feels good, do it!” – except this time, it’s for kids. I don’t care if adults want to go to (or perform in drag shows), but throwing all sorts of explicit, deviant sexual personas at the feet of elementary school kids is not normal, no matter what anyone says, including medical and mental health “professionals”.
Until something that better comes along that represents most of my beliefs and can be competitive at a national level, I am a Republican - and here is my answer to the question as to why I should care…
I guess, at least in my case, my opposition is rooted in the mutually exclusive approach the radical LGBTQers (with the “T”), supporting groups (and their allies in corporations and institutions) take.
It’s just not good enough to “coexist” because coexistence is impossible. Something must go, and that something is anything I believe is true about the natural world. In short, for transgenderism and radical LGBTQism to exist, my religion, culture, and civilization must end.
See, it isn’t enough to just leave them to their own devices and in their own communities. Claiming to seek “inclusion”, their actions tell a different story. What they demand is not inclusion because it is their position that my beliefs and my community must kneel at their altar, admit how wrong we are, deny natural law and actual science and beg for forgiveness and in the process, swear that I was wrong all along.
I have to say that butchering tender age children before they are old enough to understand the lifetime impact “top” and “bottom” surgeries will have on them is just fine. I must agree that handing out irreversible puberty blocking chemicals to children under the spell of peer pressure and social contagion is appropriate “medical care”.
Where lesbian and gay movements initially sought integration into society, this new radical LGBTQ movement that includes transgenderism, mimics the totalitarian movements of the history in its demands for purity, to purge disagreement and completely reorder society, culture and civilization.
Any vestige of any system of morality or civil order that does not promote sexual deviance and gender fluidity must be destroyed forever and society must be remade in their image.
That’s why it is my damn business.
I have a few of my own questions. Did the T join the LGBQ group so that they can tout larger numbers to the media? Did the Media through their bias reporting automatically just join the T to the group, and did LGBQ have any say in the T joining the group?
Also, I have a question to the parents of the child being forced to take the hormone blockers and the surgeries. When they are through puberty and into adulthood - can they achieve orgasm? Have the parents and medical community deprived the surgerized, chemicalized person of that emotional and physical pleasure?
And to add to that - is it like the animal who has been neutered/fixed and their temperament is now one of better obedience and easier to control? Could that also be the reason that the political left is all for this - as it will make it easier to control a group of people?
Inquisitive minds want to know!
Michael, I will continue to strenuously object to their efforts. And BTW? Stay away from my children, grandchildren, great grandchildren !