This is not compassion. It is exploitation dressed up as solidarity. truer words were never spoken.
worse - the scoundrels who are grossly profiting off the illegal and intentional decades long somali infiltration think they can shroud their treason and multi billion theft by knee jerking outrage - Frey is doing it, Walz, ellison, and by extension the progressive leaders nation wide
and we have no media to really expose it.
they will go down with dying breath perpetrating the lie.
Excellent! It's good to read material from someone who understands what's actually going on. You use the term "useful". The communists used "useful idiots" You were being nice.
Such a senseless situation. Her partner shouting “Drive, Baby, Drive” was, I think, a catalyst and she bears a great deal of responsibility in this. These demonstrations are not cosplay and the demonstrators are signing up to be disposable.
Cults have been around for a long time, and this is no different except in 1) the demographic being exploited and 2) the potentially lethal consequence for that demographic. But then, every cult has chosen its victims for a reason, and generally speaking, white middle class liberal women have financial means, are energized, and reject traditional limits on behavior. Perfect group to exploit. Now the fact that it can be deadly will sink in and eventually have an impact.
Like the Taliban used children with bombs strapped to their chests & sent ahead to kill the infidels, the foot soldiers of the ruling class liberals are sent to do the dangerous work woefully unprepared.
Behind all this activism are communist/fascist (two sides of the same coin) networks who fund & train these people. When the Soviet Union was formed Cominterns (front groups to advance communism) were formed in every nation on the globe since the goal was always global communism. History also reveals the profligate manner in which they expend human lives: communists have always utilized mass human wave assaults in war. Whether it be the vast German accounts I have studied of their experiences on the Eastern Front (where NKVD - forerunner of the KGB - would have security units behind advancing Soviet infantry units which would shoot on sight any shirkers), fighting the North Koreans then the Chinese in Korea, or often in Vietnam.
To communists, the individual is nothing; it’s all for “the cause”, “the revolution”. The individual is merely a pawn on their chessboard to be expended as necessary.
The two can’t be equated; Ashley Babbitt was unarmed & attempting to get thru a window. Officer Byrd shot her simply for attempting to trespass. Ms Good actually struck a Federal Officer with a vehicle, that’s @ least attempted murder or attempted vehicular homicide. The Federal Officer is demonized while Byrd was celebrated. Byrd should be up on murder charges.
I don't know if Byrd knew she was unarmed. WE know it now. But it doesn't excuse him because he ASSUMED she was a the "face" of a threat via the window. An "assumption/guess" was not at all what the ICE agent was faced with. She was pointed toward him and then swerved. My comment was about the public REACTION of the Left. They gave Byrd "a pass"! And the ICE agent is already "guilty as charged" to them. It's ridiculous.
Well she certainly wasn’t brandishing a weapon & he shot her anyway. That’s outside the bounds. As I understand it a police officer is only allowed to fire his weapon under an immediate threat of bodily harm/injury.
This is the ugliest truth progressives refuse to face: they don’t lead from the front. They lead from behind human shields. Renee Good wasn’t empowered—she was misled. Activist leaders wrapped her in moral certainty, sold her fake authority, and sent her into a real-world confrontation where ideology has no force field. Then they harvested the fallout. That’s the pattern. Titles without power. Courage without preparation. Risk without accountability. When reality intrudes, they sanctify the dead and absolve themselves. This isn’t compassion. It’s exploitation. A movement that treats people as disposable narrative assets is not moral. It’s cowardly—and deadly.
I totally agree. And she did so not only at her OWN peril--but with young dependent children that are now orphaned (I doubt the sanity of her "wife"). God only knows why some are able to have children but not be mentally fit to raise them as they deserve to be.
These people are manipulated psychologically . They already see themselves as "victims" of authoritarian forces and bond to ANY "cause" they deem as defending the "oppressed"--including now defending the indefensible criminals and illegal entrants in our midst.
I look at these "mobs" now and see them as if they are cast members of "Village of the Damned!". Directed by Walz and Frey. Adapted from a book they never read called "Progressives" are "Regressives".
Well said. In accident analysis, there's a concept called "normalization of deviance." For several hours prior to the incident, Ms. Good had been harassing and obstructing well-armed federal officers engaged in pursuit of lawful enforcement activities in a variety of noxious ways without significant negative consequences. But she'd been spared heretofore solely by the remarkable tolerance of those officers. Misled into a false sense of impunity, she finally pushed things too far and maneuvered herself into an unexpectedly dangerously situation that very quickly proved to be fatal.
In the final analysis, she was swept along by an irrational toxic ideology that led directly to her tragically abrupt and senseless demise.
The "privilege" we feel isn't "privilege." It is our Constitution that protects us from judicious killings. Maybe, oh I dunno, read it.
That agent was trained NOT to fire into a moving vehicle. He only needed to step aside. He drew his gun even before she shifted to drive, and his own video tells us she was turning hard right. He could see that and choose to move, but instead he chose to shoot her.
You peddle a narrative that we need to fear power and bow down to it, or we die. That is the most un-American attitude you can have about power. Our nation was founded on the grand principal that all humans have rights and that we need to limit power or sink back into the authoritarianism our founders escaped.
The Constitution teaches we all have rights, and that same Constitution holds power to account.
Why would you give power carte blanche rights to lord it over everyone? Why aren't you advocating this agent be investigated, just as any agent or police officer would be in any shooting regardless of it is justified? When you allow the state to not be held account, you open the door to authoritarianism. That is not what our nation was founded upon. Why do you on the right defend that which our founding fathers would have found abhorent?
ICE agents are already telling people they need to learn their lesson or else. Is that really what you think this nation was founded on? Is that really what the Constitution means to you?
"The real culprits are the leaders of a progressive movement that treats human beings as disposable assets. "
As if ICE thugs tearing people from cars, ripping them from their families, beating the crap out of people, and unlawfully imprisoning them without warrants honors human life.
You make quite an argument that Good panicked. As if Ross didn't? But those emotional women, you know, they are apt to panic and be all emotional. Ross wasn't emotional at all as reacted to her wife giving him a hard time and responding by capping Good three times and called her a "Fucking bitch", though.
This entire editorial is a lazy defense of authoritarianism. Stop shilling for tyranny.
excellent michael.
This is not compassion. It is exploitation dressed up as solidarity. truer words were never spoken.
worse - the scoundrels who are grossly profiting off the illegal and intentional decades long somali infiltration think they can shroud their treason and multi billion theft by knee jerking outrage - Frey is doing it, Walz, ellison, and by extension the progressive leaders nation wide
and we have no media to really expose it.
they will go down with dying breath perpetrating the lie.
Excellent! It's good to read material from someone who understands what's actually going on. You use the term "useful". The communists used "useful idiots" You were being nice.
Such a senseless situation. Her partner shouting “Drive, Baby, Drive” was, I think, a catalyst and she bears a great deal of responsibility in this. These demonstrations are not cosplay and the demonstrators are signing up to be disposable.
Cults have been around for a long time, and this is no different except in 1) the demographic being exploited and 2) the potentially lethal consequence for that demographic. But then, every cult has chosen its victims for a reason, and generally speaking, white middle class liberal women have financial means, are energized, and reject traditional limits on behavior. Perfect group to exploit. Now the fact that it can be deadly will sink in and eventually have an impact.
Like the Taliban used children with bombs strapped to their chests & sent ahead to kill the infidels, the foot soldiers of the ruling class liberals are sent to do the dangerous work woefully unprepared.
And HAMAS does it on a daily level.
Yes, you could say the same thing about the people participating in the January 6th incident at the Capitol. A woman got killed "for the cause".
Behind all this activism are communist/fascist (two sides of the same coin) networks who fund & train these people. When the Soviet Union was formed Cominterns (front groups to advance communism) were formed in every nation on the globe since the goal was always global communism. History also reveals the profligate manner in which they expend human lives: communists have always utilized mass human wave assaults in war. Whether it be the vast German accounts I have studied of their experiences on the Eastern Front (where NKVD - forerunner of the KGB - would have security units behind advancing Soviet infantry units which would shoot on sight any shirkers), fighting the North Koreans then the Chinese in Korea, or often in Vietnam.
To communists, the individual is nothing; it’s all for “the cause”, “the revolution”. The individual is merely a pawn on their chessboard to be expended as necessary.
Yes, you could say the same thing about the people participating in the January 6th incident at the Capitol. A woman got killed "for the cause".
Not quite. But I would say, The Left never questioned what Mr Byrd--the policeman who shot her without hesitation. He was cleared immediately!
That as opposed to their reaction to the ICE agent involved.
The two can’t be equated; Ashley Babbitt was unarmed & attempting to get thru a window. Officer Byrd shot her simply for attempting to trespass. Ms Good actually struck a Federal Officer with a vehicle, that’s @ least attempted murder or attempted vehicular homicide. The Federal Officer is demonized while Byrd was celebrated. Byrd should be up on murder charges.
I don't know if Byrd knew she was unarmed. WE know it now. But it doesn't excuse him because he ASSUMED she was a the "face" of a threat via the window. An "assumption/guess" was not at all what the ICE agent was faced with. She was pointed toward him and then swerved. My comment was about the public REACTION of the Left. They gave Byrd "a pass"! And the ICE agent is already "guilty as charged" to them. It's ridiculous.
Well she certainly wasn’t brandishing a weapon & he shot her anyway. That’s outside the bounds. As I understand it a police officer is only allowed to fire his weapon under an immediate threat of bodily harm/injury.
Here’s a comprehensive deep dive on the legal issues involved; many SC rulings https://open.substack.com/pub/shipwreckedcrew/p/minneapolis-is-not-even-a-close-call?r=1qo0p&utm_medium=ios&shareImageVariant=overlay
This is the ugliest truth progressives refuse to face: they don’t lead from the front. They lead from behind human shields. Renee Good wasn’t empowered—she was misled. Activist leaders wrapped her in moral certainty, sold her fake authority, and sent her into a real-world confrontation where ideology has no force field. Then they harvested the fallout. That’s the pattern. Titles without power. Courage without preparation. Risk without accountability. When reality intrudes, they sanctify the dead and absolve themselves. This isn’t compassion. It’s exploitation. A movement that treats people as disposable narrative assets is not moral. It’s cowardly—and deadly.
I totally agree. And she did so not only at her OWN peril--but with young dependent children that are now orphaned (I doubt the sanity of her "wife"). God only knows why some are able to have children but not be mentally fit to raise them as they deserve to be.
These people are manipulated psychologically . They already see themselves as "victims" of authoritarian forces and bond to ANY "cause" they deem as defending the "oppressed"--including now defending the indefensible criminals and illegal entrants in our midst.
I look at these "mobs" now and see them as if they are cast members of "Village of the Damned!". Directed by Walz and Frey. Adapted from a book they never read called "Progressives" are "Regressives".
Events like this will hopefully galvanize a coming to Je..s movement to push out the scoundrels.
Suicidal empathy resulted in a very public death.
Progressivism is officially a death cult.
All other things aside - what is up with the glove box and stuffed animals?
Yes, you could say the same thing about the people participating in the January 6th incident at the Capitol. A woman got killed "for the cause".
Well said. In accident analysis, there's a concept called "normalization of deviance." For several hours prior to the incident, Ms. Good had been harassing and obstructing well-armed federal officers engaged in pursuit of lawful enforcement activities in a variety of noxious ways without significant negative consequences. But she'd been spared heretofore solely by the remarkable tolerance of those officers. Misled into a false sense of impunity, she finally pushed things too far and maneuvered herself into an unexpectedly dangerously situation that very quickly proved to be fatal.
In the final analysis, she was swept along by an irrational toxic ideology that led directly to her tragically abrupt and senseless demise.
The "privilege" we feel isn't "privilege." It is our Constitution that protects us from judicious killings. Maybe, oh I dunno, read it.
That agent was trained NOT to fire into a moving vehicle. He only needed to step aside. He drew his gun even before she shifted to drive, and his own video tells us she was turning hard right. He could see that and choose to move, but instead he chose to shoot her.
You peddle a narrative that we need to fear power and bow down to it, or we die. That is the most un-American attitude you can have about power. Our nation was founded on the grand principal that all humans have rights and that we need to limit power or sink back into the authoritarianism our founders escaped.
The Constitution teaches we all have rights, and that same Constitution holds power to account.
Why would you give power carte blanche rights to lord it over everyone? Why aren't you advocating this agent be investigated, just as any agent or police officer would be in any shooting regardless of it is justified? When you allow the state to not be held account, you open the door to authoritarianism. That is not what our nation was founded upon. Why do you on the right defend that which our founding fathers would have found abhorent?
ICE agents are already telling people they need to learn their lesson or else. Is that really what you think this nation was founded on? Is that really what the Constitution means to you?
"The real culprits are the leaders of a progressive movement that treats human beings as disposable assets. "
As if ICE thugs tearing people from cars, ripping them from their families, beating the crap out of people, and unlawfully imprisoning them without warrants honors human life.
You make quite an argument that Good panicked. As if Ross didn't? But those emotional women, you know, they are apt to panic and be all emotional. Ross wasn't emotional at all as reacted to her wife giving him a hard time and responding by capping Good three times and called her a "Fucking bitch", though.
This entire editorial is a lazy defense of authoritarianism. Stop shilling for tyranny.
Perfectly stated Michael. Thank you .
Agree. Here is another from the angle of the Culture of Narcissism and Reactive Abuse.
https://maggierusso.substack.com/p/value-signaling-turned-deadly