OK, Groomer
Queer Theory substantiates the role the LGBTQ movement has in public schools for recruitment and sexual "grooming". It assumes heterosexuality is not natural but a learned identity.
If you are of the opinion that the LGBTQ movement's reaction, and the reactions of their enablers (like Disney), to the Florida Parental Rights in Education law has nothing to do with recruiting children into transgender and same sex lifestyles, you need to understand what the intellectuals driving their thought processes think, are saying and writing.
Watch James Lindsay’s series on “Groomer Schools”:
And then read about Queer Theory - if you so dare.
If you think Critical Race Theory is bad, you ain't seen nothing yet.
As CRT is the race-based variant of Marxist Critical Theory, Queer Theory is the sexuality-based version.
Queer theory begins with the ideas that:
Identities are not natural
Identities are performative
Identities are stable only due to the repetition of normalized acts
Queer Theory creates visibility by encouraging nonconformity
In the academic paper titled, Queer futurity and childhood innocence: Beyond the injury of development, authored by Hannah Dyer, Associate Professor in the Department of Child & Youth Studies and holds a PhD from the University of Toronto, she advances the theory that childhood innocence is merely concept, a tool of the heteronormative patriarchy to shape the future of children in a heteronormative model and “can injure the child’s development” and advance “rhetorics of childhood innocence that invalidate the child’s potential queer desires.”
How to deal with such a damaging force of heterosexuality?
“Addressing the child as always already queer may be one way of supporting their imaginative inquiries about sexuality.”
Dyer suggests that the “presumed” innocence of childhood must be destroyed.
You really must read this to believe it.
In the abstract of this paper, Dyer notes her research:
“…is not interested in minimizing the corporeal or emotional impacts of sexual trauma experienced in childhood, but in understanding the possibility for children and youth to recruit amounts of bodily pleasure. With them, I am sure that the child can be hurt by theories of precious innocence that punish curiosity and assume the child’s status as victim. This literature does not elide or contest the psychosocial damage done by molestation, rape, and other forms of child sexual abuse. Rather, it shows how making childhood sexuality a taboo subject is one way to protect the child’s assumed proto-heterosexuality.”
These are children she is talking about. Queer Theory posits that humans are sexual beings at birth, so there are no age-determined limits to sexual exploration.
If you can read these papers and watch James Lindsey’s video series and still think the LGBTQ agenda in schools isn’t tantamount to sexual grooming, nothing can help you.