If You Are Going To Be The Boss, Be The Boss

The question of what defines a woman is not trivial or a political "gotcha", it goes to the very basis of human existence - past, present and future.

As is his custom, Victor Davis Hanson wrote a column today I wish I had written (but when is that not true?).

His premise?

The Great Resetters are going to get a reset, it just isn’t the one they think it is. VDH says:

“In truth, we are about to see a radical reset—of the current reset. It will be a different sort of transformation than the elites are expecting and one that they should greatly fear.”

I thought similar thoughts the other day when Joe Biden announced there was a New World Order coming.

That one statement put Alex Jones in the hospital for an erection lasting longer than four hours. He may still be there.

I do agree with Mr. Hanson, I think most rational people are fed up with the flotsam and jetsam, but before we can make a lasting reset of the reset, we truly need to understand how we got here in the first place, or we face the real potential for a reset of the reset of the reset that will put us right back where we are today.

One beginning point is to look at the media.

I have long believed the media thought they were smarter than the average bear, and there is some truth to that, but you must ask why they swallow everything that comes from the so called “scientists” and those Democrats in government who occupy positions of trust and power – even the dumbest, most illogical stuff - when reason screams at them not to do so.

To us, they show their attack dog persona, to the Democrats, they roll over for a belly scratch.

Why?

I think it is because while the “journalists” assume they are smarter than you, they also feel inferior to those in power. It isn’t just partisanship, they are truly in awe of people like Biden, Schumer, Pelosi, Fauci, Psaki and for some unknown reason, even Kamala Harris (even though that may be more a protective instinct rather than awe).  

What about the politicos?

That is easy, they love power and there is literally nothing they won’t say, think or do to be close to power even when they know they will never be full members of the club, a very exclusive club that only invites those from the very top of the food chain, the crème de la crème of the DC political movers and shakers. Republicans simply do not offer the same level of profit for these people the Democrats do, so they tend to be Democrat sycophants.

No real surprise here.

The biggest challenge is the people who buy into every crazy idea that oozes from the anal orifices of the left.

I’ve come to believe the support the Democrats get for their insanity stems from a combination of FOMO, a fear of not always being associated with the cool kids, and a massive case of the adult version of opposition defiant disorder. The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry defines ODD as:

"...an ongoing pattern of uncooperative, defiant, and hostile behavior toward authority figures that seriously interferes with the child's day to day functioning.”

These are people who are united by opposition to something rather than a common belief in something, they will oppose anyone who presents a different view from theirs for every reason or no reason at all – the important thing is the feeling of righteousness and superiority they get from the opposition, the reason doesn’t matter.

This is the hardest nut to crack because facts and reasons do not matter to them, it is the emotional high they get from being against whatever someone is for, even in the most obvious of situations. It is the basis for the anger over the “What is a woman?” question leveled at Ketanji Brown Jackson during her confirmation hearings.

It is perhaps the easiest of all questions to answer, and yet KBJ refused and subsequently, USA Today ginned up a lengthy piece that confirms that nine out of ten dentists agree with KBJ that such a question is a challenge for scientists the world over and may never be answered. The author of this stupefying article said:

“Scientists, gender law scholars and philosophers of biology…note that a competent biologist would not be able to offer a definitive answer either. Scientists agree there is no sufficient way to clearly define what makes someone a woman, and with billions of women on the planet, there is much variation.”

Helpfully for those who can’t be bothered to read so many stupid words, USAT included these key points: “…experts say Jackson's answer was scientifically sound” and “There is no sufficient way to clearly define what makes someone a woman.”

Really, USAT? You are going with that?

The very idea that understanding the difference between man and woman, something never in question for hundreds of thousands of years of human history (at least until mental illness was discovered to be a political advantage), is now a scientific impossibility is so ridiculous it can only be understood in terms of a need to oppose, no matter how transparently idiotic the opposition is.

And yet, the media, the politicos and the people on the left are doing just that.

The only way this ends the way VDH predicts is that rational people become the majority or at least the most powerful minority. We can’t continue to ignore or suffer the fools who believe it is impossible to define man or woman - because allowing such falsities to continue without correction leads to the destruction of the very foundation of human existence.

As a mentor of mine once told me about my first managerial role, “If you are going to be the boss, be the boss.”

Time for us to step up and be the boss.