Flag on the Play
It is the reaction that often draws the penalty.
During football games at all levels, things go on at the bottom of the pile of players that go unseen by the referees. It is not unusual for players to get a shot or two in at an opposing player during a scramble for a loose ball. It is also common that the targeted player retaliates – and draws a flag, followed by a personal foul penalty - because the clapback is what the referee does see.
Yellow laundry on the field. Personal foul. Unsportsmanlike conduct. Fifteen yards and an automatic first down!
It is behind the paywall at the Wall Street Journal, but there is an opinion piece in there this morning from Molly Ball, their senior pollical correspondent, that ends in a far too familiar way:
“Debra Wilhelm, a 70-year-old retired teacher from Loxahatchee, Fla., said she viewed Jan. 6 as a national tragedy akin to 9/11. “It was an attack on our constitution, an attack on America, and from within,” she said. As the sun set over the Washington Monument behind her, she said she feared particularly for her granddaughters if Trump regained the presidency. “It’s not the America we grew up in,” she said.
Harris has wagered that more people are tired of the Trump Show than thrilled by it—that America’s true silent majority are the voters who simply want to put his divisive, destabilizing dominance of the political system behind them. In a few days, we will learn whether she is right.”
I know the only thing conservative about the Journal is the opinion page, but the denouement of this article is common to most anti-Trump articles, that the blame for our “divisive, destabilizing” environment is borne solely by Donald Trump.
Never mind that President Trump has been at the bottom of the pile getting punched in the gonads since 2015 and the refs never see it or call it. As the truism goes, when Republicans screw up, that is the story but when Democrats screw up, it is the Republican reaction to it that is the story.
Trump always gets the flag.
Democrats have been getting away with personal fouls for almost a decade. From spying on his campaign with a completely fake Crossfire Hurricane operation, to two impeachments based on nothing, to multiple cases of lawfare as election day 2024 closed in, it never stopped – and where was the media focus?
It certainly wasn’t on if any of what Democrats or their allies did was legitimate.
Even after eight years of stoking racial division, Obama had the temerity to rhetorically wax that he just didn’t understand how we got so divided.
The media never questioned whether any of this was legitimate, the dead tree media killed millions of trees to print their assassination fantasies (political, professional, and personal) and online, brain cells were assaulted with myths of Beowulf quality.
These stories all have one thing in common.
Everything was and is Trump’s fault because he didn’t just lie down and die when Democrats and their allies attacked him.
It was his reaction to what Democrats did that was the story, not what the Democrats were doing.
Trump was remarkably restrained during his term and as a private citizen he has been focused and disciplined, especially given what the Democrat-led forces have done and tried to do to him. The left is both hysterical and paralyzed with fear because they know if he is elected, he owns the referees.
I wasn’t a fan with how Trump acted during the post-election days after the tallies were completed in 2020, nor did I think he did enough to quell the protest that became a riot on January 6th but I also know there were lots of weirdness in the aftermath of that election that has never been explained to my satisfaction (and probably never will be explained) and Trump did not create, incite or participate in an insurrection.
Mayor Pete said yesterday a Harris victory would end the chaos and Trump and maybe that would give the Republican Party time to heal itself.
That’s not the way it works in America. You don’t get to cause the chaos and condemn people for not liking it – and you don’t get to define your opposition.



This election is a fierce contest between two sides: Donald Trump, and Not Donald Trump.
It's amazing to me that the margins of this election are reportedly so tight when Donald Trump is not running against a Democrat candidate. Kamala Harris is so profoundly terrible as a candidate that she provides literally zero benefit to her own ticket. The same can also be said of Tim Walz. They are non-entities, running solely on animosity for Trump. And that animosity is entirely synthetic - a creation of the media, entirely constructed by lies.
In every election, you can name good reasons to vote for either side. There were good things about Joe Biden, Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Al Gore, and their platforms. Same for Trump, Romney, Bush, etc. But Kamala Harris is so uniquely unaccomplished, her platform so vague, that even her own supporters can't name a single credible, tangible reason to vote for her.
Seriously, Charlie Kirk has asked hundreds of Kamala supporters on camera to name "her greatest accomplishment" or "one achievement during her time as VP". Not one person has answered with something even halfway convincing.
I personally don't sense that the depth of hatred for Trump is sufficient enough to deliver a fair election to a non-candidate like Kamala. I don't think a Kamala win could or will be delivered honestly. So it does beg the question - why did they pick her? Do they know something we don't?
Mayor Pete ?? A wastrel and incompetent to boot. We all would be under the boot if this comment prevails.